The NFL Network has a great deal of entertaining programming. They need to fill their schedule during the off-season. As a result, they are constantly coming up with their lists.
They have been showing the Top 100 of the 2011 season. I find it difficult to accept how they come up with their rankings. Apparently, so does Bear's LB Brian Urlacher who felt he should have been higher than #51.
What is the difference that separates #50 from #52? I'm sure the NFL Network uses one of their sophisticated ranking models. I think it's much easier to come up with the Top 10 rather tan the Top 100. Maybe they should just call the show the "Best Players of the NFL".
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.